Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 06:40
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
How to watch Apple’s WWDC keynote with iOS 26 and more - 9to5Mac
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Stellar Blade More Than Doubles Sony’s Previous Steam CCU Record for Single Player Games - Wccftech
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Is it true that Jehovah's witnesses once thought the world would end in 1975?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
How can Ukraine and Russia resolve their conflicts?
What’s next?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What does the stink of the skunk look like? Why would it be dangerous?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
11 confirmed dead after flooding, identities of three victims released - WOAI
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
The closer a volcano is to erupting, the greener the trees around it look from space - Live Science